|
Why is it important to evaluate time dependent inhibition?
Cytochromes P450 (CYP) are a family of enzymes which play a major role in the metabolism of drugs. Inhibition of CYP enzymes is one of the most common causes of drug-drug interactions. The mechanism of inhibition can be reversible, quasi-irreversible or irreversible.
The consequences of irreversible inhibition are considered to be more serious than reversible inhibition because the inactivated enzyme must be re-synthesised before activity is restored. In addition, the irreversible inactivation usually implies the formation of a covalent bond between the metabolite and the enzyme, which can lead to hapten formation and can in some cases trigger an autoimmune response. For these reasons it is important to study the mechanism of the CYP inhibition of new potential drugs as early as possible during the drug discovery process.
Although the terms time dependent inhibition (TDI) and mechanism based inhibition (MBI) are often used inter-changeably, there is a distinct difference scientifically. Time dependent inhibition is defined as an interaction where there is an enhanced inhibition if the test compound is pre-incubated with the metabolising system prior to addition of the substrate. Mechanism based inhibition specifically refers to a subset of time dependent inhibition which defines inactivation of the enzyme by a chemically reactive metabolite.1
The draft FDA guidance for drug interactions (February 2012)3 recommend evaluating time dependent inhibition for investigational drugs.
Please provide an overview of the Cytochrome P450 Time Dependent Inhibition; IC50 Shift Assay.
The Cytochrome P450 Time Dependent Inhibition IC50 Shift assay is able to identify both reversible and time-dependent inhibitors. The IC50 shift assay determines the IC50 value (concentration which produces 50% inhibition) of test compound under three different experimental conditions; 0 min pre-incubation, 30 min pre-incubation minus NADPH and 30 min pre-incubation plus NADPH. Following the pre-incubation with/without NADPH, isoform-specific substrates are added to measure the residual enzyme activity without a dilution step, running the incubation under linear conditions. If the compound is a time-dependent inhibitor a shift to the left (increase in potency) will occur between the 30 min pre-incubation minus NADPH and 30 min pre-incubation plus NADPH. The ratio of these two values gives the IC50 shift.
Figure 4
Example IC50 shift profile
How do I interpret the data from the IC50 shift assay?
Using the IC50 shift assay, it is possible to distinguish between reversible and irreversible inhibition. For solely reversible inhibitors addition of a 30 min pre-incubation gives no change in the IC50. Consequently all three experimental conditions will give the same IC50. Alternatively for compounds which are only time dependent inhibitors, an IC50 will be calculated only when NADPH is present in the pre-incubation and no effect is observed in the 0 min pre-incubation or 30 min pre-incubation minus NADPH. Test compounds which exhibit both reversible and time dependent inhibition will give a lower IC50 with a 30 min pre-incubation in the presence of NADPH compared to a 30 min pre-incubation minus NADPH and 0 min pre-incubation and thus an IC50 shift can be calculated as shown in Figure 4.
Very occasionally a shift may be observed between the 0 min pre-incubation and 30 min pre-incubation minus NADPH. This indicates potential non-NADPH mediated metabolism of one test compound into a more potent inhibitor species although this is rarely observed with CYP450 enzymes.4
A fold shift of greater than 1.5 is considered to be a significant shift and the compound is classed as a time dependent inhibitor.5 Inhibition potency must always be considered in the context of expected in vivo concentrations of the test compound. Although the criteria for acceptance are project and isoform-specific, potent inhibition is considered unfavourable and may preclude the development of a compound. Further work should then be completed to evaluate the mechanism of time-dependent inhibition or determine KI and kinact values to predict the risk of drug-drug interactions in vivo.6
Why and when would you run an IC50 shift assay compared with single point TDI and reversible inhibition screens?
Reversible and single point TDI assays are considered early stage ADME assays and are designed for larger sets of compounds, whereas the IC50 shift assay is run at a later stage to give more detail on leading compounds. It is advisable to run a reversible inhibition assay prior to running an IC50 shift assay. Although this provides the same information as a 0 min pre-incubation it enables an appropriate concentration range for the assay to be pitched so to achieve the most accurate IC50 shift calculation. Useful information can also be achieved from running a single point TDI assay prior to the IC50 shift assay, as it gives an indication of how much of a time-dependent element of inhibition the compound undergoes.
The IC50 shift screen gives a greater amount of information than the single point assay which can be further used to plan kinetic studies so to predict in vivo risk of drug-drug interactions.
Why is there no dilution step between the pre-incubation and incubation steps?
A dilution step is an additional factor in the assay conditions which can skew the behaviour of the inhibitor and complicate data processing. Pre-incubating the test compound at 10x higher microsomal protein concentration than that in the incubation step introduces the possibility for higher protein binding, reducing the amount of free compound available for inhibition. This can give an under-prediction of potency. Additionally, differences can be observed in data processing depending on whether the inhibitor concentration in the ‘pre-incubation’ is taken, compared with the ‘incubation’ i.e. diluted 1 in 10. Thus could give a difference in potency of 10×. The effect is more pronounced upon compounds which have a reversible inhibition element compared with those which are solely time-dependent inhibitors.
Consequently an IC50 shift assay which does not have a dilution step gives the most accurate representation of a 30 min pre-incubation, providing unambiguous information for analysing compounds for further work. For further information, our poster title ‘Comparison of the effect of assay conditions on interpretation of time-dependent inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes’ is available to download at http://www.cyprotex.com/publicationslibrary/
Why are different assay conditions used for the single point time dependent inhibition assay and IC50 shift assay?
The single point TDI assay is very much an early ADME screen designed for a higher number of compounds where it is important to get a snapshot of the amount of time-dependent inhibition at a top concentration relative to expected therapeutic concentrations. Therefore by completing a 1 in 10 dilution step between the pre-incubation and incubation this reduces the potential for reversible inhibition to occur. This dilution is not sufficient for all compounds to remove the reversible inhibition element, especially for potent inhibitors, and thus the % inhibition results are processed accounting for all inhibition. Using a substrate concentration that is 5× Km also helps to decrease the reversible inhibition component so an accurate measure of TDI can be obtained.
Can I further characterise the time-dependent inhibition determined?
If an IC50 shift is observed, a KI and kinact determination assay should be determined. This ascertains the time-dependent inhibition kinetic constants, where kinact is the maximal rate of enzyme inactivation at a saturating concentration of inhibitor and KI is the concentration of inhibitor which gives half the maximal rate of inactivation. Alongside in vivo data, this can be used to predict the risk of drug-drug interactions (AUCi/AUC).6
Mechanistic studies can be used to derive whether the inhibition observed is mechanism (metabolism)-based or time-dependent, i.e. forms a metabolite that covalently binds to amino acids or quasi-irreversibly coordinates to the heme group. Mechanism based inhibition can be confirmed as irreversible inhibition by undergoing dialysis or ultra-filtration where activity will not be restored if true mechanism dependent inhibition is observed. Formation of metabolite-inhibitor complexes can be measured by an increase in absorbance at 455nm compared to standard absorbance at 450nm of the ferrous-carbon monoxide complex. Further experiments using potassium ferricyanide should reverse the formation of the metabolite-inhibitor complex.1
back to top
|